Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Nakanwagi v. United States Postal Services et al
as 1:2023cv13118
Plaintiff:
Pro se litigant Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi
Defendant:
United States Postal Services and City of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Agut v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2023cv11889
Plaintiff:
Agut Deng Agut
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Tom Kimber, Christopher Joyce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Turner v. The United States Postal Service
as 1:2023cv10752
Plaintiff:
Michaela Turner
Defendant:
The United States Postal Service, Avon Police Department, Christopher Bartolla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Howell v. Massachusetts Attorneys General et al
as 1:2021cv11979
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howell
Defendant:
Massachusetts Attorneys General, Department of Justice, Lowell Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pankey v. United Housing et al
as 1:2017cv11454
Plaintiff:
Teisha Albert Pankey
Defendant:
United Housing, City of Boston, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Powell v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2015cv12913
Plaintiff:
Margaret V. Powell
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jerry Worlds & American Fair Gift Association, Inc. v. Cahalen et al
as 4:2014cv40158
Defendant:
Gannett Publications, Creditscore.com, Switchboard LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Worlds & American Fair Gift Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gill et al v. Office of Personnel Management et al
as 1:2009cv10309
Plaintiff:
Nancy Gill, Nancy Gill, Nancy Gill and others
Defendant:
Office of Personnel Management, United States Postal Service, John E. Potter and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
