Cases 1 - 10 of 540
FOGEL v. BLINKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
MALPHINE FOGEL
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Davis v. Crime Stoppers PA et al
as 1:2024cv00984
Plaintiff:
Rafiyq Davis
Defendant:
Crime Stoppers PA, Crime Watch PA, PA State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PODLUCKY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOSPEH PODLUCKY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Jones v. United States
as 1:2024cv00869
Plaintiff:
Joshua Anthony Jones
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hudwell et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01226
Plaintiff:
Malika Hudwell, Ikeem Adams, Malika Hudwell on behalf of minor children Z.H.T. and N.H.A. and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Williams v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jamiel Lawrence Williams
Defendant:
United States, State of Pennsylvania, Dr. Laurel R. Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01966
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE BUDD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01970
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, THE BUDD COMPANY, DR. MESHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01912
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
