Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brett v. Trump et al
as 1:2023cv00983
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Attorney General William Bahr, Philadelphia PA US Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brett v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv01059
Defendant:
Mr. Ditrolio, U.S. Marshal Cook, Mr. Gaven and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. Gale et al
as 1:2020cv01805
Defendant:
Martha Gale, President Judge Richard A. Lewis, Adrian and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00016
Defendant:
Lt. DAVIS, DEREK F. OBERLANDER, MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO MORALES VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
VASQUEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv04911
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
ANA VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKEESPORT BLACK STUDENT UNION et al v. MCKEESPORT AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2019cv00405
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA WEBB, DEJA NEWBY, JASONA BELYEU and others
Defendant:
MARK P. HOLTZMAN, JR. and MCKEESPORT AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2018cv04999
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON and LANCASTER COUNTY
Plaintiff:
WALTER VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORTESE v. SABATINO et al
as 2:2018cv03804
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, DAMON VASQUEZ, ARTHUR SABATINO and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. CORTESE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ v. CITY OF ALLENTOWN et al
as 5:2014cv05891
Plaintiff:
FLORENCIO VASQUEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF ALLENTOWN and ANDREW HOLVECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kuhn v. Reid et al
as 3:2008cv01104
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Kuhn
Defendant:
R.A. Reid, Ronald Laino, Karen Hogstein and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
