Cases 1 - 10 of 12
McCoy v. Experian Information Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
Lydia McCoy
Defendant:
Experian Information Services, Inc., Equifax Information Services LLC, BH Management Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1965 (RICO)
Doe v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 6:2021cv00314
Defendant:
Christopher Nakamoto, Shanard Carey, East Baton Rouge Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yela Fiduciary Services, LLC et al v. Benton County et al
as 6:2020cv01925
Defendant:
Benton County, Evan Mohr, Lance Loberg and others
Plaintiff:
Yela Fiduciary Services, LLC and Emery Sund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Taylor et al
as 6:2018cv01909
Plaintiff:
Christopher White
Defendant:
David Sawyer and Don Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight et al v. Crain et al
as 1:2014cv00075
Defendant:
Access, Nurse Artist, Ashland Christian Fellowship and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Lynn Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dover v. Haley et al
as 3:2013cv01360
Defendant:
25 Jane Does, 25 John Does, ALJ Rick Barber and others
Plaintiff:
MD Eric A. Dover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ogle v. Yates et al
as 3:2012cv00571
Defendant:
50 Jane Does, 50 John Does, Carolyn Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Ogle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. Brown et al
as 3:2011cv00975
Defendant:
John V. Acosta, Sam Adams, Ann L. Aiken and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kelly v. Eckert et al
as 3:2011cv00949
Defendant:
John V. Acosta, Sam Adams, Ann L. Aiken and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
v. White et al
as 6:2010cv06315
Defendant:
Amertitle of Salem Oregon and Betty Joe White
Plaintiff:
Michael Tuch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
