Cases 1 - 10 of 4,339
Rajkarnikar v. US Attorney's Office
as 3:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Nirjala Rajkarnikar
Defendant:
US Attorney's Office, David Azia, US Attorneys and others
Baker v. Town of Hamden et al
as 3:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Patrick Baker
Defendant:
Town of Hamden, Veterinary Associates of Derby LLC, Central Hospital for Veterinary Medicine, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cornish v. Town of New Britain et al
as 3:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
ORane M. Cornish, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of New Britain, Calvin Wentworth, Matthew Marino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cepeda v. Winfertility, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00857
Plaintiff:
Jose Cepeda
Defendant:
Winfertility, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Clark v. Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc., Olga L. Orengo and Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stancuna v. Town of Westport et al
as 3:2024cv00848
Plaintiff:
Marin Stancuna
Defendant:
Town of Westport and William Harmer
Mair v. Milford Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Debbie Mair
Defendant:
Milford Police Department, Noss Steven and Williams Barbour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VonDrake Harris v. Berchem et al
as 3:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Gerard VonDrake Harris
Defendant:
Jonathan David Berchem and Paige Bodnar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gupte v. Albertus Magnus College
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Pradeep B. Gupte
Defendant:
Albertus Magnus College
Drake v. Breitling USA Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Breitling USA Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation, Costco Wholesale Membership, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
