Cases 51 - 60 of 80
United States of America v. The State of Alabama et al
as 2:2012cv00179
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The State of Alabama and Beth Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Gardner v. FLC, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00708
Plaintiff:
Betty Gardner
Defendant:
FLC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Graves et al v. City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2011cv00557
Plaintiff:
Gregory Graves and Darryl Sinkfield
Defendant:
City of Montgomery , Todd Strange , Cornelius Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alabama Democratic Conference, The et al v. Strange et al
as 5:2011cv02449
Plaintiff:
Alabama Democratic Conference, The , Eddie Greene , James Griffin and others
Defendant:
Luther Strange , Robert L Broussard and Bryce U Graham, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Judd v. Secretary of State of Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 2:2011cv00437
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
Secretary of State of Alabama and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Judd v. Secretary of State of Alabama et al
as 2:2011cv00333
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
Secretary of State of Alabama and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Little v. Strange (PANEL)
as 2:2011cv00107
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Little
Defendant:
Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Johnson et al v. Riley et al
as 7:2010cv02067
Plaintiff:
William Johnson , Annie Pearl Leftwich , Bobbie Morgan and others
Defendant:
Bob Riley and John M Tyson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Delander v. Medical Staffing Network, Inc.
as 2:2009cv02010
Plaintiff:
Heather Lynne Delander
Defendant:
Medical Staffing Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ai v. Thomas Medical Center
as 1:2009cv00340
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Frances Ai
Defendant:
Thomas Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 rt Job Discrimination/Retaliation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
