Cases 1 - 10 of 44
United Sovereign Americans, Inc, et al. v. State of Ohio et al.
as 5:2024cv01359
Petitioner:
James Rigano, United Sovereign Americans, Inc., Carrie Perkins and others
Respondent:
Office of The Ohio Secretary of State, Dave Yost, Ohio Board of Voting Machine Examiners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NRSC, et al v. FEC, et al
as 24-3051
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, JAMES D. VANCE, Senator and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ALLEN JOSEPH DICKERSON, in his official capacity as a Commissioner and the Chair of the Federal Election Commission, DARA LINDENBAUM, in her official capacity as a Commissioner and the Vice Chair of the Federal Election Commission and others
Amicus Curiae:
MITCH MCCONNELL, Senator, INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH, STATE OF OHIO and others
Crista Eggers, et al v. Robert Evnen
as 22-2268
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Crista Eggers and Nebraskans for Medical Marijuana, NMM
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert B. Evnen
Appellant:
State of Arkansas, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Not Yet Classified:
Raise the Wage Nebraska, Anthony B. Schutz, Steven R. Dunbar and others
United States of America v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv02575
Defendant:
Brad Raffensperger, The State of Georgia and The Georgia State Election Board
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Intervenor Defendant:
Republican National Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee and Georgia Republican Party Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Greater Georgia Action, Inc., American Center for Law and Justice, Members of Congress and others
Petitioner:
Public Interest Legal Foundation and District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Inst, et al v. John Kasich, et al
as 18-4258
Petitioner / Appellant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and ADAM KINCAID
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR JOHN R. KASICH, In his official capacity, LARRY OBHOF, President of the Ohio Senate, in his official capacity, JON HUSTED, Secretary of State of Ohio, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NORTHEAST OHIO YOUNG BLACK DEMOCRATS, SARAH INSKEEP, A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE OF OHIO and others
Intervenor:
STEVE CHABOT, et al
Gerald Phillips v. Lorain Cnty Bd of Elections, et al
as 16-4065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD W. PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
LORAINE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, THOMAS SMITH, HELEN HURST and others
Phillips v. Lorain County Board of Elections et al
as 1:2016cv01689
Plaintiff:
Gerald W. Phillips
Defendant:
Lorain County Board of Elections , Thomas Smith , Helen Hurst and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
The Northeast Ohio Coalition, et al v. Jon Husted, et al
as 16-3691
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
THE NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS, COLUMBUS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS and OHIO DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 1199
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
JON HUSTED, in his official capacity as Secretary of the State of Ohio
Intervenor - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO
The Northeast Ohio Coalition, et al v. Jon Husted, et al
as 16-3603
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS, COLUMBUS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS and OHIO DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 1199
Defendant - Appellant:
JON HUSTED, in his official capacity as Secretary of the State of Ohio
Intervenor - Appellant:
STATE OF OHIO
Ohio Democratic Party, et al v. Jon Husted, et al
as 16-3561
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OHIO DEMOCRATIC PARTY, DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY, MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JON HUSTED, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Ohio and MIKE DEWINE, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Ohio
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
