Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Singletary v. Cramer et al
as 2:2023cv06086
Plaintiff:
John Singletary
Defendant:
Isaac Cramer, Keith Rossoen, Thomas James Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 - Voting Rights Act of 1965
Lisenby v. Rasar et al
as 1:2021cv01139
Plaintiff:
Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr and Malik Al-Shabazz
Defendant:
Michael Rasar, Tahirah Thomas and Shanda Priester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas et al v. Andino et al
as 3:2020cv01552
Plaintiff:
Family Unit Inc, The, Dr Brenda Williams, Trena Walker and others
Defendant:
Scott Moseley, Henry D McMaster, Marci Andino and others
Intervenor:
South Carolina Republican Party
Interested Party:
United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
Attorney General Alan Wilson and Protection and Advocacy for People with Disabilities Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Backus et al v. State of South Carolina, The et al
as 3:2011cv03120
Plaintiff:
Vandroth Backus , Willie Harrison Brown , Charlesann Buttone and others
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, The , Nimrata Nikki R Haley , Ken Ard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Backus et al v. State of South Carolina, The et al
as 2:2011cv03120
Plaintiff:
Vandroth Backus , Willie Harrison Brown , Charlesann Buttone and others
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, The , Nimrata Nikki R Haley , Ken Ard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Gray et al v. South Carolina State Election Commission et al
as 3:2009cv02126
Plaintiff:
Kevin Alexander Gray, Glen Davis, Cassandra Fralix and others
Defendant:
South Carolina State Election Commission, John H Hudgens, Cynthia M Bensch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 - Voting Rights Act of 1965
South Carolina Green Party et al v. South Carolina State Election Commission et al
as 3:2008cv02790
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Green Party, Eugene Platt and Robert Dunham
Defendant:
South Carolina State Election Commission, John H Hudgens, Cynthia M Bensch and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
