Cases 11 - 20 of 21
ACKERMAN v. OFFICE OF BEHAVIOR HEALTH et al
as 2:2013cv00417
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES ACKERMAN
Defendant:
OFFICE OF BEHAVIOR HEALTH, JIM TURN and KIM WELSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
ACKERMAN v. MERCY BEHAVIOR HEALTH et al
as 2:2012cv01807
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES ACKERMAN
Defendant:
RAY WOLF and MERCY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SWANSON
as 1:2012cv00310
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM SWANSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
SNYDER v. RMWS LIMITED et al
as 2:2012cv00912
Plaintiff:
SHANNI SNYDER
Defendant:
RMWS LIMITED, SCALISE CONSTRUCTION, INC., WILLIAM SCALISE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SNYDER v. DAUGHERTY et al
as 2:2011cv00879
Plaintiff:
SHANNI SNYDER
Defendant:
MICHAEL DAUGHERTY , DAVID BERTOK , ROBERT RIZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEVY v. TRENT MOTEL ASSOCIATES, LP et al
as 2:2011cv00776
Plaintiff:
BRET LEVY
Defendant:
TRENT MOTEL ASSOCIATES, LP , STADIUM HOTEL RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. , BARRY SUSSMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WELLS v. THE PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2009cv00598
Plaintiff:
JAMILLAH WELLS
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, KIM WELLS, VERA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCKIVITZ et al v. TOWNSHIP OF STOWE et al
as 2:2008cv01247
Plaintiff:
JEANNE MCKIVITZ and ROBERT MCKIVITZ
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF STOWE, TOWNSHIP OF STOWE ZONING BOARD ADJUSTMENT and WILLIAM J. SAVATT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PRICE v. NOLASCO
as 2:2007cv04345
Plaintiff:
RONNIE WILLIAMS PRICE
Defendant:
JOHNNY NOLASCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PRICE v. NOLASCO
as 2:2007cv03894
Plaintiff:
RONNIE WILLIAMS PRICE
Defendant:
JOHNNY NOLASCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
