Cases 61 - 70 of 180
CHURCHWELL V. CITY OF CONCORD
as 1:2016cv01114
Plaintiff:
JANA CHURCHWELL
Defendant:
CITY OF CONCORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Caldwell et al v. City of Hickory Public Housing Authority et al
as 5:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
Temesha Caldwell , Alyssa Goss , Jesse Huffman and others
Defendant:
City of Hickory Public Housing Authority, Unifour Capital Ventures, Inc. and Montele Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mays v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority
as 3:2016cv00203
Defendant:
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority
Plaintiff:
Amy Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
EEOC v. Mission Hospital, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00118
Plaintiff:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant:
Mission Hospital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Morgan v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2016cv00092
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Morgan
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Brittany Woods, Talis Management Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
REEL, ET AL V. BEULAH MAE MOBILE HOME PARK, LLC, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv01045
Plaintiff:
ANDREA B. REEL and DANTE ELDRIDGE
Defendant:
BEULAH MAE MOBILE HOME PARK, LLC, SHARLENE GATES and FRED GATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JEFFREYS v. DDR-SAU SOUTH SQUARE, L.L.C.
as 1:2015cv00089
Defendant:
DDR-SAU SOUTH SQUARE, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
JEFFREYS and KENNETH JEFFREYS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Jeffreys v. Carolina Premium Outlets, LLC
as 5:2014cv00446
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jeffreys
Defendant:
Carolina Premium Outlets, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jeffreys v. Harvest Oaks Drive Associates, LLC
as 5:2015cv00493
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jeffreys
Defendant:
SCP York Harvest, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jeffreys v. Knightdale Crossings LLC
as 5:2015cv00450
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jeffreys
Defendant:
Knightdale Crossings LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
