Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Pruitt et al v. Hansen & Adkins, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Pruitt, II, Donna M. Pruitt and Alicia Tucker
Defendant:
Hansen & Adkins, Inc., Hansen & Adkins Auto Transport, Inc., Royal Truck Leasing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14501 Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act
Dunnavant v. Hansen & Adkins Auto Transport, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Brandy Lee Dunnavant
Defendant:
Hansen & Adkins Auto Transport, Inc., Royal Truck Leasing, LLC, Hansen & Adkins Auto Logistics, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14501 Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act
Morgan et al v. Hansen & Adkins Auto Transport, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Hayle Morgan, Roma Fox, James Whited and others
Defendant:
Hansen & Adkins Auto Transport, Inc., Royal Truck Leasing LLC, Hansen & Adkins Auto Logistics, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14501 Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act
Gulley et al v. Hansen & Adkins Auto Transport, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Candice L. Gulley, Tommy Gulley, Donald A. Burdette and others
Defendant:
James B. Woodfork, Woodfork Enterprises, Inc., Hansen & Adkins Auto Logistics, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14501 Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act
Total Quality Logistics, LLC v. LSM Transport, LLC
as 1:2014cv00403
Plaintiff:
Total Quality Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
LSM Transport, LLC
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
LSM Transport, LLC
Thirdparty_defendant:
Allstate Produce, Hansen Fruit Company, LP and CPC International Apple Co.
Counter_claimant:
LSM Transport, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Total Quality Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hansen v. Bekins Van Lines, L.L.C.
as 5:2012cv00793
Defendant:
Bekins Van Lines, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
