Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Wang v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04198
Plaintiff:
Hao Zhe Wang
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. and North Lane Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hunter v. Murdoch et al
as 0:2019cv00590
Defendant:
William J. Clinton Foundation, The, Paul Watcher AT&T Inc., City of Saint Paul and others
Plaintiff:
Dannez Hunter
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kennedy v. United States et al
as 4:2019cv00124
Defendant:
David R McAtee, John J. Stephens, United States and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Senthilnathan v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2017cv01385
Plaintiff:
Rajamani Senthilnathan
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Senthilnathan v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2017cv01381
Plaintiff:
Rajamani Senthilnathan
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Stratos et al v. AMR Inc et al
as 3:2012cv02912
Plaintiff:
George Hewreas Stratos and Diana Stratos
Defendant:
AMR Inc, American Airlines Inc, Boeing CO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Guthrie v. US Government et al
as 1:2012cv22193
Plaintiff:
Randolph H. Guthrie, III
Defendant:
US Government, City of New York, City of Miami, FL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Bressert v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 1:2012cv03984
Plaintiff:
Jerome Bressert
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC , AT&T Inc. and Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Guthrie, III v. United States Government
as 11-1053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Randolph H. Guthrie, III
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Government, Federal Bureau of Investigation, City of New York and others
Guthrie III v. US Government et al
as 1:2011cv00211
Plaintiff:
Randolph H. Guthrie III
Defendant:
US Government, FBI, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
