Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Boone County Commission et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00613
Plaintiff:
Boone County Commission, Cabell County Commission, City of Vienna, West Virginia and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
The Board of Education of Mason County, West Virginia et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc., United States
as 3:2021cv00280
Plaintiff:
The Board of Education of Marion County, West Virginia, The Board of Education of Mason County, West Virginia and The Board of Education of Wyoming County, West Virginia
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc., United States
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
CITY OF CHARLES TOWN v. AMERISOURCE BERGEN DRUG CORP. et al
as 3:2019cv00040
Defendant:
SPECGX, LLC, HARVARD DRUG GROUP, MI, ALLERGAN SALES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF CHARLES TOWN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Vienna, West Virginia v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00052
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Vienna, West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801
Moore v. Kagler et al
as 5:2014cv00033
Plaintiff:
Harry W. Moore
Defendant:
Robert W. Kagler, Marshall County Commission, Hayhurst Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
City National Bank of West Virginia v. Grimm, Kellmeyer, Garlow and Associates Insurance Agency, Inc. et al.
as 2:2008cv00109
Plaintiff:
City National Bank of West Virginia, City National Bank of West Virginia, City National Bank of West Virginia and others
Defendant:
Grimm, Kellmeyer, Garlow and Associates Insurance Agency, Inc., Garlow Insurance Agency, Inc., Philip Garlow and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Merritt v. Cochran-Youell et al
as 2:2006cv00885
Plaintiff:
Earl Robert Merritt, Jr.
Defendant:
Lucy Florence Cochran-Youell, Linda Youell-Taylor, Donald Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
