Cases 91 - 100 of 2,502
Russell v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jerome Russell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bryant v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv08016
Petitioner:
Larry Leon Bryant
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Frazier v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv08010
Petitioner:
Anthony Lamon Frazier
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Barnes v. USA
as 1:2023cv00187
Petitioner:
Lawrence Carrol Barnes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Marshall v. USA
as 1:2023cv00188
Petitioner:
Lakendrick Shanchez Marshall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harris v. USA
as 2:2023cv00174
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Bernard Harris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Castro Martinez v. USA
as 1:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
Mike Castro Martinez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rowe v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Richard Carl Rowe, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bateman v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08007
Petitioner:
Nathan Parke Bateman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bradford v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08012
Petitioner:
Shannon Terelle Bradford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
