Cases 101 - 110 of 1,086
Sanchez v. Garrido
as 4:2022cv00902
Petitioner:
Fernando Sanchez
Defendant:
Warden F.J. Garrdio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ronald Eddie Sanchez v. Warden
as 5:2022cv01680
Petitioner:
Ronald Eddie Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Warden
as 3:2022cv01435
Petitioner:
Ronald Eddie Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez-Leyva v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00121
Petitioner:
Gerardo Antonio Sanchez-Leyva
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone and Warden, FCI Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Juan J. Sanchez v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01034
Petitioner:
Juan J. Sanchez
Respondent:
A. Tovar, et al. and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez, Gerzon v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2022cv00517
Petitioner:
Gerzon Sanchez
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Lumpkin
as 1:2022cv00125
Petitioner:
Jesus Dagoberto Sanchez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez-Salinas v. Sanchez
as 2:2022cv00200
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Hernandez-Salinas
Respondent:
Jerry Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Caballero v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2022cv00916
Petitioner:
Juan L Caballero
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin and Jerry Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez-Delgado v. USA
as 4:2022cv00678
Petitioner:
Francisco Sanchez-Delgado
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
