Cases 101 - 110 of 129
Wheeler v. Boyd et al
as 1:2009cv02322
Petitioner:
Mark Shannon Wheeler
Respondent:
Louis D. Boyd and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Price
as 1:2009cv00707
Petitioner:
Terrance D. Williams
Respondent:
Cheryl Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. U.S.P.-Marion, IL et al
as 2:2009cv01946
Petitioner:
D. Wallace Mitchell
Respondent:
Brian A. Bledsoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dupree v. Mitchem et al
as 4:2009cv00964
Plaintiff:
John D. Dupree
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duncan v. Wheeler-White et al (INMATE2)
as 1:2009cv00416
Plaintiff:
Sharon D. Duncan
Defendant:
Cynthia S. Wheeler-White and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garth v. Licefoose
as 2:2009cv00785
Petitioner:
Shunetta Roshel Garth
Respondent:
D Licefoose and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearson v. Wise et al
as 7:2009cv00682
Petitioner:
Michael Jerome Pearson, Jr
Respondent:
D J Wise and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Price
as 1:2009cv00174
Petitioner:
Terrance D. Williams
Respondent:
Cheryl Price
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Buckhault v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00111
Petitioner:
Clifton D. Buckhault
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peeples v. Tidmore et al
as 7:2009cv00236
Petitioner:
Mario Andjuan Peeples
Respondent:
Barbara D. Tidmore, James J. Reddoch and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
