Cases 101 - 110 of 8,018
KNOX v. USA
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
CEDERICK EURYAN KNOX
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
NEAL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER LEE NEAL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Safrit v. Ishee
as 1:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Matthew Aaron Safrit
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinton v. United States Incorporated et al
as 3:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Charles E. Hinton
Respondent:
United States Incorporated, Roy A. Cooper, Todd Ishee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spann v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Spann
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BENITEZ-FLORES v. USA
as 1:2024cv00136
Petitioner:
JORGE LUIS BENITEZ-FLORES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LAMBERT v. RANDOLPH COUNTY COURT
as 1:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
BRANSON LAMBERT
Respondent:
RANDOLPH COUNTY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McCall v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02041
Petitioner:
Dashawn Jewelin McCall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pacheco v. Duncan et al
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Respondent:
Michael D. Duncan, Heather S. Warren, Graylan Groce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Grissett v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02038
Petitioner:
Richard Hugh Grissett
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
