Cases 111 - 120 of 220
GANS v. HARRY et al
as 2:2020cv00875
Petitioner:
KEVIN GANS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO, LUREAL HARRY and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LARRY S. KRASNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pitts v. Ransome et al
as 3:2020cv00234
Respondent:
Superintendent Ransome, Josh Shapiro, Larry Krasner and others
Petitioner:
Terrance Pitts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PAXTON v. DR. MARSH et al
as 2:2020cv00772
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO, DR. MARSH and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS
Petitioner:
WILLIAM EDWARD PAXTON, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NYE v. SHAPIRO et al
as 3:2019cv00218
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, LEO DUNN and JOSH SHAPIRO
Petitioner:
BRIAN LEWIS NYE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moss v. Woolf et al
as 1:2019cv02129
Petitioner:
Craig Moss
Respondent:
Scott A. Woolf, Josh Shapiro, PA State Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GIBSON v. MASON et al
as 2:2020cv00562
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, LAWRENCE KRASNER, JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Petitioner:
BILLY GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILSON v. DELBALSO et al
as 2:2019cv05723
Respondent:
TERESA DELBALSO, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Petitioner:
LEROY A. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ADAMS v. MARSH et al
as 2:2019cv05795
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSH SHAPIRO, DR. ROBERT MARSH and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
FRANK ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TUNSTALL v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2020cv00346
Respondent:
LARRY KRASNER, ROBERT GILMORE and JOSH SHAPIRO
Petitioner:
JOSEPH TUNSTALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carpio-Santiago v. Tice et al
as 5:2020cv00261
Respondent:
ERIC TICE and Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro
Petitioner:
Juan Carpio-Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
