Cases 121 - 130 of 1,649
Ruthers v. Turner
as 1:2022cv00161
Interested Party:
Diane Murphy Smith
Petitioner:
Thomas G Ruthers, Jr
Respondent:
Cory Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Tripp
as 4:2023cv00003
Petitioner:
Craig Eugene Smith
Respondent:
Chris Tripp
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. State of Iowa
as 4:2022cv00416
Petitioner:
Ian Thomas Barnes
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Anamosa State Penitentiary
as 1:2023af08888
Petitioner:
Test Smith
Respondent:
Anamosa State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Iowa, State of
as 1:2022cv00163
Petitioner:
Daniel Frederick King, II
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Copenhaver v. Tripp
as 1:2022cv00135
Petitioner:
Randy Mitchell Copenhaver
Respondent:
Chris Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tournier v. Iowa, State of
as 6:2022cv02066
Petitioner:
Dale R Tournier
Respondent:
Iowa, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv03037
Petitioner:
Amy Marie Campbell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barrese v. State of Iowa
as 4:2022cv00352
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Barrese
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. State of Iowa
as 4:2022cv00407
Petitioner:
Arzel Jones
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
