General Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 141 - 150 of 8,000
Belvin v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02026
Petitioner: Frederic Belvin
Respondent: Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Santos v. Unknown Respondent
as 5:2024hc02019
Petitioner: Andreuris Santos
Respondent: Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Phillips v. Priest
as 5:2023hc02273
Petitioner: William Stevenson Phillips
Respondent: Pazavar Priest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fessel v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02015
Petitioner: Greg Fessel
Respondent: Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Perry v. Locklear
as 7:2024cv00028
Petitioner: Brian Keith Perry
Respondent: Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez-Diaz v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02022
Petitioner: Julio Rodriguez-Diaz
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dixon v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02014
Petitioner: David Keandre Dixon
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rutledge v. State of North Carolina We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00020
Petitioner: Christopher R. Rutledge
Respondent: State of North Carolina and The State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02003
Petitioner: Michael Eugene Hunt
Respondent: Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
PORTER v. KELLY
as 1:2023cv01094
Petitioner: WAYNE PORTER
Respondent: LB KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?