Cases 161 - 170 of 4,806
Odom, Jr v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00679
Petitioner:
Melvin A. Odom, Jr
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buckley v. Scott, et al
as 1:2023cv01145
Petitioner:
Dameion Buckley
Respondent:
Angela Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Green v. Eller
as 1:2023cv01170
Petitioner:
Donte Green
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eason v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02396
Petitioner:
Marcus Lamont Eason
Defendant:
Warden Bowers
Respondent:
Warden of FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fralix v. Phillips
as 1:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
Carey Fralix
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Forney v. Sexton
as 2:2023cv00092
Petitioner:
Anthony Ray Forney
Respondent:
Keith Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02443
Petitioner:
Jermaine Hill
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers and United State Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cantu v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02376
Petitioner:
Oziel Cantu
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers, C. Peters, T.D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00227
Petitioner:
Jeffery Davis
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neal v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Terry Neal
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
