Cases 171 - 180 of 2,617
Sanchez v. Alves
as 1:2022cv10746
Petitioner:
Elias Sanchez
Respondent:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv10625
Petitioner:
Terence L Thomas
Respondent:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bae v. Moniz
as 1:2022cv10427
Petitioner:
Yoonsang Bae
Respondent:
Antone Moniz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Watson v. Dolan et al
as 1:2022cv10546
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Byron Watson
Defendant:
Edward Dolan
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. McDonald et al
as 1:2022cv10369
Plaintiff:
Duane Curtis Gomez
Respondent:
Sheriff Joseph D. McDonald, Jr. and Antone Moniz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dubois v. Alves
as 1:2022cv10362
Petitioner:
Paul Dubois
Respondent:
Nelson V Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv10469
Petitioner:
Reginald Allen Jackson
Respondent:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Newton v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv10333
Petitioner:
Faith Newton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Newton v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv10538
Petitioner:
Faith Newton
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Marshalls and Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anderson v. Moniz
as 1:2022cv10640
Petitioner:
Craig O Anderson
Respondent:
Antone Moniz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
