Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Cobble v. Atkinson et al
as 5:2017hc02153
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Respondent:
Kenny Atkinson, Jeff Sessions, US Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Steiger v. Governor of North Carolina et al
as 5:2015hc02257
Petitioner:
Bradley Joseph Steiger
Respondent:
Governor of North Carolina, Governor of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ALLEN-BEY v. SECRETARY OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2015cv00696
Petitioner:
JUAN FITZGERALD ALLEN-BEY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gaston v. Secretary of the N.C. Department of Corrections
as 3:2015cv00126
Petitioner:
Marty Tarrell Gaston
Respondent:
Secretary of the N.C. Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Department of Correction
as 5:2014hc02200
Petitioner:
Rodney McDonald Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bond v. North Carolina Department of Corrections
as 3:2014de00379
Plaintiff:
Damien A Bond
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Graham v. Department of Correction
as 5:2014hc02004
Petitioner:
Frankie Graham
Respondent:
Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRAHAM v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2013cv01135
Petitioner:
FRANKIE GRAHAM
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murray v. Department of Corrections
as 5:2013hc02134
Petitioner:
James H. Murray
Respondent:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOONE v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2012cv00002
Petitioner:
TRUMAN CALVIN BOONE
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
