Cases 11 - 19 of 19
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03579
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JOHN W. KERESTES and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lebo v. Kerestes et al
as 1:2013cv01637
Petitioner:
John Lebo, Jr.
Respondent:
John W. Kerestes and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2013cv03197
Petitioner:
KEVIN F. JOHNSON
Respondent:
JOHN W. KERESTES and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eric Joseph v. John Kereste
as 12-3471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC JOSEPH
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. KERESTES, et al
JOSEPH v. KERESTES
as 2:2012cv04132
Petitioner:
ERIC JOSEPH
Respondent:
JOHN W. KERESTES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Freeman v. John Kerestes, et al
as 12-2608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES NICHOLAS FREEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. KERESTES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
PITTS v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2012cv02661
Petitioner:
DEXTER PITTS
Respondent:
JOHN W. KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FREEMAN v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2012cv00155
Petitioner:
JAMES NICOLAS FREEMAN
Respondent:
JOHN W. KERESTES , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PHOMMA v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2011cv05832
Petitioner:
KHAMPHOY PHOMMA
Respondent:
JOHN W. KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
