General Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 11 - 20 of 106
Turchin v. Clendenion We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00258
Petitioner: Joseph John Turchin
Respondent: Jason Clendenion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keasling v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00529
Petitioner: John Michael Keasling
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Via v. Mehr
as 1:2022cv01172
Petitioner: Dustin Blake Via
Defendant: Sheriff John Mehr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hessmer v. Bryan
as 3:2022cv00203
Petitioner: John Allen Hessmer
Respondent: Sheriff Robert Bryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Norwood v. Yates We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00080
Petitioner: Tracy Lynn Norwood
Respondent: Warden John Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Norwood v. Yates
as 1:2022mc00009
Petitioner: Tracy Lynn Norwood
Respondent: Warden John Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brent v. Vantell
as 1:2022cv01005
Petitioner: John Brent
Respondent: Vinnie Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Hall et al
as 3:2021cv00856
Petitioner: James Smith doing business as James Dallas Smith
Respondent: Daron Hall and Judge John Aaron Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fowler v. Yates We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01165
Petitioner: Kenny Fowler
Respondent: Warden John Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Newell v. Warden FCI Memphis
as 2:2021cv02513
Petitioner: John Wesley Newell
Respondent: Warden FCI Memphis and A.W. Childress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?