Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Ramirez-Ramos #225324 v. Ryan et al
as 3:2018cv08086
Petitioner:
Felix Verano Ramirez-Ramos
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez-Esperano v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv04668
Petitioner:
Jesus Antonio Ramirez-Esperano
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv04088
Petitioner:
Miguel Alvarado Ramirez, Sr.
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez v. Ryan et al
as 3:2017cv08105
Petitioner:
Bryan Lee Ramirez
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia #243523 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv04517
Petitioner:
Roberto Ramirez Garcia
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan , Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez-Quintero #167695 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv04085
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Ramirez-Quintero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez v. Ryan et al
as 3:2016cv08224
Petitioner:
Jose Jesus Ramirez
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reyes v. Steinle et al
as 2:2016cv01325
Plaintiff:
Serafin Reyes, Jr.
Defendant:
Roland J Steinle, Stephanie Ramirez and Maricopa County Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez-Gonzalez v. Chartle et al
as 4:2016cv00078
Petitioner:
Jorge Ramirez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Unknown Chartle and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramirez # 147145 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2015cv00503
Petitioner:
Angel Javier Ramirez
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
