Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Cotton v. Dewalt et al
as 5:2008cv00443
Petitioner:
Alfronzo Cotton, II
Defendant:
Stephen Dewalt, Harley G. Lappin, The Office of the Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCarty v. Dewalt
as 5:2008cv00433
Petitioner:
Harold Dean McCarty
Respondent:
Stephen Dewalt
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Edwards, Jr. v. Dewalt et al
as 5:2008cv00346
Petitioner:
George H. Edwards, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Dewalt and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Staples v. Dewalt et al
as 5:2008cv03159
Petitioner:
William Staples
Respondent:
Stephen Dewalt, Bureau of Prisons and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Belcher v. Dewalt
as 5:2008cv00216
Petitioner:
Stephen Cortez Belcher
Respondent:
Stephen Dewalt
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Moon v. Dewalt et al
as 5:2008cv00140
Petitioner:
Anthony Lawayne Moon
Respondent:
Stephen Dewalt and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Russell v. Dewalt
as 5:2008cv00139
Petitioner:
Darnell D. Russell
Respondent:
Stephen Dewalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Belcher v. Dewalt
as 5:2008cv00075
Petitioner:
Stephen Cortez Belcher
Respondent:
Stephen Dewalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oatneal v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2007cv00204
Plaintiff:
Harold G. E. Oatneal
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Alberto Gonzales, Stephen Dewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Medcalf v. Dewalt et al
as 5:2007cv00193
Petitioner:
Lonnetta Medcalf
Respondent:
Stephen Dewalt and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
