Cases 11 - 20 of 330
Williams v. Carver
as 5:2023hc02257
Petitioner:
Charles A. Williams
Respondent:
Ben Carver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horne v. United States of America
as 5:2023hc02238
Petitioner:
William Henry Horne, IV
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beltran v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02223
Petitioner:
Hilario Renato Mendoza Beltran and Hilario Mendoza Beltran
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Woods
as 3:2023cv00529
Petitioner:
Percy Allen Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Chris Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez Gonzalez v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02190
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Perez Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Villanueva-Raygoza v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02189
Petitioner:
Gabino Villanueva-Raygoza
Respondent:
William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bashir v. Holzapfel et al
as 5:2023hc02187
Petitioner:
El-Amin Bashir
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel and Warden A. Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Clark et al
as 5:2023hc02181
Petitioner:
Charles A. Williams
Respondent:
Officer Clark and DHO Dexter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Woods
as 5:2023hc02183
Petitioner:
Percy Allen Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Chris Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02174
Petitioner:
Jose Gregorio Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
