Cases 11 - 20 of 516
Wilder v. Sheriff
as 3:2023cv00964
Petitioner:
Earl D Wilder
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00959
Petitioner:
Robert D Rice
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00947
Petitioner:
Michael Derrick Alexander and Michael D Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEELY v. WARDEN
as 3:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
KYLE D. NEELY
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00915
Petitioner:
Eberaia D Fields and Eberaia Fields
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00897
Petitioner:
Eberaia D Fields
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
INGRAM v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2023cv01591
Petitioner:
KEVIN D. INGRAM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wall v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00787
Petitioner:
Michael D Wall
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OWENS v. ZATECKY
as 2:2023cv00403
Petitioner:
WILLIAM OWENS
Respondent:
D. ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00672
Petitioner:
Kevin D White
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
