Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Johnny Huff v. Attorney General of Virginia
as 09-6492
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNY R. HUFF
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Johnny Huff v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 08-7305
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNY R. HUFF
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA
Overton v. Attorney General Of Virginia
as 7:2008cv00447
Plaintiff:
Maynard Orville Overton
Defendant:
Attorney General Of Virginia
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joseph Stevens v. Douglas Vaughn
as 08-7090
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH P. STEVENS
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUG VAUGHN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA
Huff v. Attorney General of Virginia et al
as 3:2008cv00257
Petitioner:
Johnny R. Huff
Respondent:
Attorney General of Virginia and Commonwealth of Virginia Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Delio Anzualda, Jr. v. Gene Johnson
as 08-6203
Petitioner - Appellant:
DELIO ANZUALDA, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA
Michael Owens v. Attorney General of Virginia
as 08-6139
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL W. OWENS
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA and DIRECTOR, Virginia Department of Corrections
Freddy Wambach v. George Hinkle
as 07-7665
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDDY L. WAMBACH
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE M. HINKLE, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA
Respondent:
CLAUDE M. HILTON, U.S. District Judge
Owens v. Attorney General of Virginia et al
as 1:2007cv00965
Petitioner:
Michael W. Owens
Respondent:
Attorney General of Virginia and Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cannon v. The Attorney General of Virginia
as 2:2007cv00333
Petitioner:
Phillip H. Cannon
Respondent:
The Attorney General of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
