Cases 21 - 30 of 2,330
(HC) Luna v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv01686
Respondent:
B. Phillips
Petitioner:
Benito Julian Luna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony-El v. Circuit Court of the twentieth Judicial Circuit et al
as 3:2024cv01448
Respondent:
Jesse Phillips, Circuit Court of the twentieth Judicial Circuit, State of Illinois and others
Petitioner:
Javier Anthony-El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriquez v. LSCI-Allenwood
as 3:2024cv00920
Respondent:
Warden of LSCI-Allenwood
Petitioner:
Thomas Phillip Rodriquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shavers v. Phillips
as 4:2024cv03272
Respondent:
B. Phillips
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Shavers, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moises Lopez v. B. Phillips
as 2:2024cv04204
Respondent:
B. Phillips
Petitioner:
Moises Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillip Jacobs v. Warden
as 24-3419
Petitioner:
PHILLIP DOUGLAS JACOBS
Respondent:
WARDEN, Marion Correctional Institution
Phillip Pond v. Daniel Mosteller, et al
as 24-1972
Petitioner:
Phillip W. Pond
Respondent:
Daniel C. Mosteller, United States Marshals, Kevin Thom and others
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 1:2024cv00554
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv01306
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chrustowski v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv00555
Petitioner:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Respondent:
Robert Bishop and Phillip Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
