Cases 21 - 30 of 329
Williams v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2023hc02169
Petitioner:
Chris Shawn Williams and Christopher S. Williams
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. BRUNSWICK COUNTY COURT
as 1:2023cv00602
Petitioner:
JOEY LAVON WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BRUNSWICK COUNTY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Segura v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02156
Petitioner:
Daniel Segura
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02148
Petitioner:
Julio Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Bullard
as 5:2023hc02140
Petitioner:
Charles A. Williams
Respondent:
Warden Jamie Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cephas v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02133
Petitioner:
Richard Cephas
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Villanueva-Raygoza v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02128
Petitioner:
Gabino Villanueva-Raygoza
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Espiritusanto v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02127
Petitioner:
Baudilio Espiritusanto
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Castillo-Bustos v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02122
Petitioner:
Edinson Elias Castillo-Bustos
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02118
Petitioner:
Chris Shawn Williams
Respondent:
North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
