Cases 21 - 30 of 818
Faustino-Anaya v. State of Washington
as 4:2023cv05117
Petitioner:
Arnulfo Faustino-Anaya
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACK v. JACK et al
as 1:2023cv02303
Petitioner:
JOHN JACK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF WASHINGTON, OFFICE OF THE BISHIP - DIOCESE OF TEXARKANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. State of Washington
as 3:2023cv05563
Petitioner:
Bartholomew Lee Jones
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shenefield v. State of Washington
as 3:2023cv05617
Petitioner:
Damien Michael Shenefield
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Serrano v. State of Washington
as 3:2023cv05600
Petitioner:
Ramil Agles Serrano
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Smith v. State of Washington
as 23-35477
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN GARRETT SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Luis Perez v. Michael Sparber, et al
as 23-35048
Petitioner / Appellant:
LUIS ANDRE PEREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL SPARBER, Spokane County Jail Director and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Mahmoud v. Speer
as 3:2023cv05494
Petitioner:
Afif Mahmoud
Respondent:
State of Washington and Scott Speer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hart v. State of Washington
as 2:2023cv00114
Petitioner:
Jason Mark Hart
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. State of Washington
as 1:2023cv03067
Petitioner:
Clayton Eugene Hill
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
