Cases 21 - 30 of 41,962
Shockley v. Collin County Detention Facility
as 4:2024cv00508
Petitioner:
Charles Wayne Shockley
Respondent:
Collin County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
James Robert Bailey
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Guevara v. Rowe
as 5:2024cv00128
Petitioner:
Rogelio Guevara
Respondent:
Kelly S. Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Baker v. MTC et al
as 3:2024cv01330
Petitioner:
Ajalon Baker
Respondent:
MTC, TDCJ, FNU Rayford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mosquera v. Rivers
as 4:2024cv00495
Petitioner:
Jose Adelmo Mosquera
Respondent:
Warden Christopher Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00485
Petitioner:
Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wheat v. Creuzot
as 3:2024cv01297
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wheat
Defendant:
John Creuzot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Westerby v. Randall County Parole et al
as 5:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Charles E Westerby
Respondent:
Randall County Parole and TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Villafranco Jr. v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00128
Petitioner:
Jesse Villafranco Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans Jr. v. Lumpkin Case electronically transferred to Eastern District of Texas- Tyler.
as 6:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Evans Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
