General Cases filed in Kentucky
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,258
Gardner v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner: Troy Gardner
Respondent: Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coffman v. Roby
as 6:2024cv00040
Petitioner: Timothy S. Coffman
Respondent: Amy Roby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Triana-Ceballos v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Alejandro Triana-Ceballos
Defendant: Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James v. Warden, USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00039
Petitioner: Crandall James
Respondent: Warden, USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Figueroa v. USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00030
Petitioner: Luis Figueroa
Respondent: USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hambrick v. Robey et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Petitioner: Brandon Hambrick, Jr.
Respondent: Amy Robey and Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Couch v. Akers
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff: Alastair Couch
Defendant: Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Commonwealth Kentucky
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: Cecil Bennett
Defendant: Commonwealth Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacy v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner: Marvell Jermaine Lacy, Jr.
Respondent: Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Moore v. Hughes
as 2:2024cv00005
Petitioner: Michael Ernest Moore
Respondent: Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?