Cases 31 - 40 of 127
CORBETT v. CLARK et al
as 1:2020cv00102
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS
Petitioner:
BURL NEIL CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. CLARK et al
as 2:2020cv01988
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS and SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CLARK
Petitioner:
JERMAINE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FENTON v. CLARK et al
as 1:2020cv00069
Petitioner:
EUGENE FENTON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, SUP. MICHAEL CLARK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. CLARK et al
as 1:2020cv00462
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, The District Attorney of the County of Erie and Superintendent Michael Clark
Petitioner:
Bryant K. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. CLARK et al
as 2:2020cv01361
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE and MICHAEL CLARK
Petitioner:
BRYANT K. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Corbett v. Clark et al
as 1:2020cv00313
Petitioner:
Burl Neil Corbett
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General Office and Michael Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GANT v. CLARK et al
as 2:2020cv00821
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL CLARK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
KALIF V. GANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROSARIO v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv06211
Petitioner:
NATHAN ROSARIO
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL CLARK and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GANT v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv05177
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL CLARK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSLYVANIA and others
Petitioner:
KALIF V. GANT and MR. KALIF V. GANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAYNES v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv01407
Petitioner:
NATHAN HAYNES
Respondent:
JOHN SHAPIRO, MICHAEL CLARK and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
