Cases 31 - 40 of 353
BAUGH v. PARKE CO SHERIFF'S DPT et al
as 2:2023cv00136
Petitioner:
WILLIAM E. BAUGH
Respondent:
PARKE CO SHERIFF'S DPT, STATE OF INDIANA and PARKE COUNTY IN CIRCUIT COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARDNER v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2023cv00081
Petitioner:
JALIEN GARDNER
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STONE-DUNLAP v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv02403
Petitioner:
ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HORNS v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv02406
Petitioner:
VINCENT HORNS
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DALE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2022cv00569
Petitioner:
JEREMY L. DALE
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PURNELL v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv02355
Petitioner:
EDWARD PURNELL
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DALE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2022cv00556
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
JEREMY L. DALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv02177
Petitioner:
KAYCEE ANDERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIXON v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv01845
Petitioner:
JAQUELL LA'RON DIXON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA and COUNTY OF MARION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITAKER v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv01711
Defendant:
MICHAEL AARON WHITAKER and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
