Cases 31 - 40 of 227
Claiborne v. Leeds
as 3:2023cv00237
Petitioner:
Mischa Knight Claiborne
Respondent:
Warden Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eason v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02396
Petitioner:
Marcus Lamont Eason
Defendant:
Warden Bowers
Respondent:
Warden of FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Levy v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02395
Petitioner:
Marcus Levy
Respondent:
United States of America and Acting Warden Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chandler v. Fine et al
as 2:2023cv02325
Plaintiff:
Rashad Chandler
Defendant:
Sergeant Robert Fine, Lieutenant F/N/U Ivory, Sergeant F/N/U Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padgett v. Eller
as 3:2023cv00469
Petitioner:
Garner Dwight Padgett
Respondent:
Warden Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02188
Petitioner:
Steven L. Hunter
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Townsend v. Leeds et al
as 3:2023cv00220
Petitioner:
Alfonso Townsend
Respondent:
Warden f/n/u Leeds and Core Civic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avila-Salazar v. Perry, Warden
as 3:2023cv00189
Petitioner:
Alejandro Avila-Salazar
Respondent:
Grady Perry, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Clendenion
as 1:2023cv00011
Petitioner:
Donte Bell
Defendant:
Warden Jason Clendenion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schelfe v. Perry
as 3:2023cv00162
Petitioner:
Jonathan David Schelfe
Respondent:
Warden Grady Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
