Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Jaime Marrero v. Stevenson
as 16-6546
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAIME MARRERO
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVENSON, Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Carson v. South Carolina, State of
as 8:2015cv05074
Petitioner:
David Cortez Carson
Respondent:
Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jumper v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2015cv04848
Petitioner:
Jason Jumper
Respondent:
Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Byrd v. State of South Carolina
as 6:2015cv04518
Petitioner:
James Robert Byrd
Respondent:
Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Timothy Lamar Wallace v. Robert M. Stevenson, III
as 15-7626
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY LAMAR WALLACE
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT M. STEVENSON, III, Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cook v. Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
as 0:2015cv02987
Petitioner:
Darryl T Cook
Respondent:
Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cameron v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 1:2015cv01355
Petitioner:
Ronald Francis Cameron
Respondent:
Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. State of South Carolina
as 1:2015cv01108
Petitioner:
Jhune Harris
Respondent:
Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Belton v. Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
as 6:2015cv00262
Petitioner:
Herman Belton
Respondent:
Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Elders v. South Carolina
as 8:2014cv04916
Petitioner:
Randy Elders
Respondent:
Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.