Cases 31 - 40 of 3,632
Lopez v. Tegels
as 2:2024cv00483
Petitioner:
Roberto I Lopez
Respondent:
Warden Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carpenter, Ronald v. Cromwell, Dan
as 3:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
Ronald Marion Carpenter
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puchner v. Maxwell et al
as 2:2024cv00478
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Mike Maxwell, Lisa Neubauer, Eric Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
May v. McDermott
as 2:2024cv00450
Petitioner:
Edith Mae May
Respondent:
Jennifer McDermott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hauke, Joseph v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
Joseph J. Hauke
Defendant:
Gregory A. Parker, Mathew Kolell, Chris Madle and others
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alvarado v. Hepp
as 2:2024cv00421
Petitioner:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Respondent:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lush, Stephen v. Van Rybroek, Gregory
as 3:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Stephen Lush
Respondent:
Gregory Van Rybroek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez, Ted v. Tegels, Lizzie
as 3:2024cv00223
Petitioner:
Ted Lopez
Respondent:
Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hineman v. Gierach
as 2:2024cv00415
Petitioner:
Jeffrey L. Hineman and Jeffrey L Hineman
Respondent:
Michael Gireach and Warden Michael Gierach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Benzel
as 2:2024cv00413
Petitioner:
Tomaz S Robinson
Respondent:
Jason Benzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
