Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Evans v. Davenport et al
as 1:2011cv00544
Petitioner:
Leslie Evans
Respondent:
Carter F. Davenport and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vann v. Hale et al
as 2:2011cv02800
Petitioner:
Jay F Vann
Respondent:
Attorney General of State of Alabama, The and Michael Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whatley v. Davenport et al (INMATE1)
as 3:2011cv00524
Defendant:
Carter F. Davenport and Luther Strange
Plaintiff:
Travis Whatley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Price et al (INAMTE2)
as 2:2010cv00886
Plaintiff:
Leon F. Williams
Defendant:
Cheryl Price and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McKnight v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2010cv00893
Plaintiff:
Lowana F. McKnight
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Allen et al
as 2:2009cv02544
Petitioner:
Danny L. Smith
Respondent:
Richard F. Allen, David J. Wise, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swopes v. Attorney General of the State of Alabama
as 5:2009cv01202
Petitioner:
Sabrina F Swopes
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sasser v. Allen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00551
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Sasser
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen, Louis Boyd and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swopes v. Wheeler-White et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00461
Plaintiff:
Sabrina F. Swopes
Defendant:
Cynthia S. Wheeler-White and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Becker v. Brightler
as 2:2008cv00858
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Respondent:
Margaret Brightler
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
