Cases 41 - 50 of 51
BANKS v. HORNAK et al
as 2:2016mc00079
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
MARK HORNAK, ORLANDO HARPER, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. STEELE et al
as 2:2016cv00589
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
KEVIN STEELE, DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE MONTGOMERY COUNTY, WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. District Attorneys Office et al
as 1:2016cv00081
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
District Attorneys Office, Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Warden, County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2015cv01498
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, ROBERT CESSOR, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. PERDENE et al
as 2:2015cv01346
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
WARDEN PERDENE, ORLANDO HARPER, US ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Perdene et al
as 1:2015cv01854
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Perdene, Orlando Harper, U.S. Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Johns et al
as 1:2013cv00704
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Johns, Assistant Education Supervisor, Helena C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BANKS v. PUGH et al
as 2:2013cv00119
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
M. PUGH, CCA (CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA), NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks v. Pugh et al
as 1:2013cv00142
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
M. Pugh, CCA (Corrections Corporation of America), Northeast Ohio Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BANKS v. PATTON
as 2:2011cv05677
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
PATTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
