Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Flores v. Davis
as 1:2018cv00959
Respondent:
Ken Paxton and Sr. Warden Rocky Moore
Petitioner:
Saul Isaac Flores
Defendant:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Padilla v. United States Supreme Court
as 1:2018cv01016
Respondent:
United States Supreme Court and Ken Paxton
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marlon v. Redd et al
as 4:2018cv01941
Plaintiff:
Oliveira Florinda Marlon
Defendant:
Francis Diane Redd, Alex Azar, Daniel R Levinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Sheppard v. Paxton
as 6:2018cv00094
Defendant:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Attorney General Ken Paxton
Petitioner:
Wilfred Warren Sheppard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perkins v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2018cv00201
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Custodian Sally Hernandez and Ken Paxton
Petitioner:
Wes Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reighley v. The State of Texas et al
as 3:2018cv00320
Petitioner:
Michael Reighley
Respondent:
The State of Texas, Hon Ken Paxton , Hon Dale Hanna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robles v. Paxton et al
as 5:2018cv00063
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Ken Paxton and Javier Salazar
Petitioner:
Steven Robles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nguyen vs Paxton
as 4:2018cv00022
Petitioner:
Ky Cao Nguyen
Respondent:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alan Johnson v. Darleen Drew, et al
as 17-11439
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALAN WADE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, DARLEEN DREW, Warden, USP-Atlanta and KEN PAXTON, Attorney General, the State of Texas
Knight v. Shults et al
as 3:2017cv00831
Plaintiff:
Prince Knight
Defendant:
L. Shults, Z. Lee and J. Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
