Cases 41 - 50 of 1,858
Castaneda-Benavidez v. Joseph
as 5:2024cv01037
Petitioner:
Cesar Castaneda-Benavidez
Respondent:
Warden Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mills v. Cohen
as 4:2024cv00963
Petitioner:
Joseph Elijah Mills
Respondent:
Warden Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Greenville County Court et al
as 2:2024cv00943
Petitioner:
Kelvin Toyo Henry
Respondent:
Sheriff Greenville County Court, Sheriff Greenville Police Department, Cheif Consel Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spade v. Sharp
as 1:2024cv00866
Petitioner:
Daniel William Spade
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lotharp v. Joseph
as 4:2024cv00858
Petitioner:
Zannie J. Lotharp and Zannie Jay Lotharp
Respondent:
Warden M. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Godbee v. Graham
as 2:2024cv00702
Petitioner:
Burnett Godbee
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wills v. Cohen
as 5:2024cv00708
Petitioner:
Theodore Wills
Respondent:
Warden Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Budden v. Janson
as 9:2024cv00678
Petitioner:
LeAndre Dion Budden
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Warden of Bennettsville FCI
as 5:2024cv00585
Petitioner:
Marshall DeWayne Williams
Respondent:
Warden of Bennettsville FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Broadnax v. Jackson
as 4:2024cv00531
Petitioner:
Christopher Broadnax
Respondent:
Warden Shane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
