Cases 61 - 70 of 70
RIVERS v. THOMAS
as 1:2008cv00482
Petitioner:
DUANNE DA'VON RIVERS
Respondent:
SANDRA F. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clark v. United States of America et al
as 5:2008hc02045
Petitioner:
Jerry Allen Clark
Respondent:
United States of America, Michael Mukassey, A. F. Beeler and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hutchins v. Beeler
as 5:2008hc02042
Petitioner:
James H. Hutchins
Respondent:
A. F. Beeler
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LaSorsa v. Beeler
as 5:2008hc02023
Petitioner:
Nicholas LaSorsa
Respondent:
Arthur F. Beeler
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Tucker v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 5:2007hc02202
Petitioner:
Cornelius Tucker, Jr.
Respondent:
U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Eastern District Court, F. Corpening and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Godfrey v. Polk County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 1:2007cv00270
Petitioner:
Johnny F. Godfrey
Respondent:
Polk County Sheriffs Dept. and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tucker v. United States District Court et al
as 5:2007hc02128
Petitioner:
Cornelius Tucker, Jr.
Respondent:
United States District Court, T.W. Boyle, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 5:2007hc02109
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Stewart Hudson, Virginia Lameneck, G.W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carrafa v. Beeler
as 5:2007hc02092
Petitioner:
Victor Carrafa
Respondent:
A. F. Beeler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Polk v. Beeler et al
as 5:2007hc02064
Petitioner:
Kevin Sean Polk
Defendant:
A. F. Beeler and Alberto Gonazalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
