Cases 61 - 70 of 235
White v. Collier
as 3:2022cv00127
Petitioner:
Marcus White
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huggins v. Collier
as 4:2022cv00963
Petitioner:
Tommy Faris Huggins
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blacklock v. Collier
as 4:2022cv00975
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Blacklock
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCutcheon v. Lumpkin
as 3:2022cv00054
Petitioner:
BRITTNEY CNAE McCUTCHEON and Brittney McCutcheon
Respondent:
Bryan Collier - TDCJ Director and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv00445
Petitioner:
Raymond Earl Carr
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00066
Defendant:
Demico Stanley and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanley v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Demico Stanley
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Stanley et al
as 4:2022cv00065
Defendant:
Demico Stanley and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv01372
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Diaz
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pasillas v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv00201
Petitioner:
Steve Pasillas
Respondent:
FNU Thompson, Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
