Cases 61 - 70 of 206
Quevedo v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2022cv05021
Petitioner:
Carlos C. Quevedo
Respondent:
Daniel Sullivan and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bausch v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2022cv04026
Petitioner:
Joshua Allen Bausch
Respondent:
Daniel Sullivan and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eric Harcey v. Warden Brent Fluke, et al
as 22-1211
Petitioner / Appellant:
Eric Harcey
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Brent Fluke and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Peter Mayen v. Brent Fluke, et al
as 22-1204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Peter Mayen
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden Brent Fluke and Jason Ravnsborg, The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Marty Banghart v. Doug Clark, et al
as 22-1200
Petitioner / Appellant:
Marty Joe Banghart
Respondent / Appellee:
Doug Clark, Acting Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary and Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Banzi v. Fluke et al
as 4:2021cv04207
Petitioner:
Defed Banzi
Respondent:
Brent Fluke, Richard A Sommers, Christy Serr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gomez v. Mattson et al
as 4:2021cv04177
Petitioner:
Daniel Jose Gomez
Respondent:
Michael Mattson, Jerry Miller and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steele v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv04171
Petitioner:
Phillip D. Steele
Respondent:
Doug Clark and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Craig v. Fluke et al
as 1:2021cv01028
Petitioner:
Jerry Lee Craig, Sr.
Respondent:
Brent Fluke and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christians v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv04159
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Christians
Respondent:
Doug Clark and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
