Cases 61 - 70 of 537
Leffebre v. Quay et al
as 1:2020cv01896
Petitioner:
Andre D. Leffebre
Respondent:
David Paul, Regional Director, M.D. Carvajal and Warden Quay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCGINNIS v. OBERLANDER et. al
as 2:2020cv01525
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OBERLANDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Petitioner:
FRANK D. MCGINNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WINSTON v. OBERLANDER et al
as 2:2020cv04994
Petitioner:
WILLIAM WINSTON
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUPERINTENDENT D. OBERLANDER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Goolsby, Sr. v. Howard
as 1:2020cv01299
Petitioner:
Ian D. Goolsby, Sr.
Respondent:
Catricia Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martinez v. Overlander et al
as 4:2020cv00971
Respondent:
D. Overlander and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Petitioner:
Angel L. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Leffebre v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00969
Petitioner:
Andre D. Leffebre
Respondent:
William Barr, Mr. Carvajal and H. Quay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lenchick v. Easter
as 3:2020cv00905
Petitioner:
Josh Lenchick
Respondent:
Warden D. Easter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Simonetti v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2020cv00904
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Warden Gregory Briggs, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and others
Petitioner:
Anthony D. Simonetti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cicchiello v. Easter et al
as 3:2020cv00777
Petitioner:
Joan Cicchiello
Respondent:
Richael Carvajal and D. Easter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILSON v. WALTON et al
as 2:2020cv00619
Defendant:
WARDEN JOHN R. WALTON, WESTMORELAND COUNTY DA OFFICE and WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Plaintiff:
STEFON D. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
