Cases 71 - 80 of 21,265
Muhammad v. Eldridge et al
as 1:2024cv01402
Petitioner:
Walid Abdullah Muhammad
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and William A. Eldridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pinkham, Sr. v. Arviza
as 3:2024cv01416
Petitioner:
Dale Maurice Pinkham, Sr.
Respondent:
M. Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Huffman v. Close et al
as 4:2024cv01421
Respondent:
David Close and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Petitioner:
James Lee Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FOWLER v. GREY
as 2:2024cv04306
Petitioner:
DR. TANYA L. FOWLER
Respondent:
JUDGE DAINE GREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
IN RE: KEITH DOUGHERTY
as 2:2024cv04366
Petitioner:
KEITH DOUGHERTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Trujillo v. Arviza
as 3:2024cv01396
Petitioner:
Armando Trujillo
Respondent:
Warden Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woodard v. Pennsylvania Parole Board et al
as 1:2024cv01381
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Pennsylvania Parole Board and Superintendent of SCI-Huntingdon
Petitioner:
Jeremy Travis Woodard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muhammad v. Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv04285
Plaintiff:
Waliyd A Muhammad
Defendant:
COI SHERIFF and Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CANNON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00230
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI MCKEAN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
CLIFTON TERRELL CANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GALE v. COMMONWEALTH
as 2:2024cv04240
Petitioner:
EARL GALE
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
