Cases 71 - 80 of 2,764
Arnold v. Witt
as 0:2023cv02806
Petitioner:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold, III
Respondent:
Sheriff Dawanna Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv03178
Petitioner:
Francisco Martinez
Respondent:
Warden B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv03227
Petitioner:
Howard Young
Respondent:
Warden B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tizoc v. Rardin
as 0:2023cv02819
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Tizoc
Respondent:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McReynolds v. Witt
as 0:2023cv02712
Petitioner:
Hajji Y. McReynolds
Respondent:
Sheriff Dawanna S. Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McReynolds v. Witt
as 0:2023cv02708
Petitioner:
Hajji Y. McReynolds
Respondent:
Sheriff Dawanna S. Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02718
Petitioner:
Christopher J Gonzalez
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Purdy v. James et al
as 0:2023cv03148
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Colin Purdy
Respondent:
Kendal James, Ned G. Wohlman and Jordan DePonty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McReynolds v. Witt
as 0:2023cv02681
Petitioner:
Hajji Y. McReynolds
Respondent:
Dawanna S. Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. United States of America et al
as 0:2023cv02807
Petitioner:
Paris La Monte Hunter
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.